Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

India: PIL against insistence of sex-reassignment surgery proof for passport

 | 
11/13/2019

An LGBT activist has approached the Madras high court to declare a proviso in passport rules mandating submission of sex re-assignment surgery certificate for effecting change of sex in passport, as illegal and unconstitutional. Admitting the PIL, filed by T D Sivakumar, a division bench of Justice M Sathyanarayanan and Justice N Seshasayee ordered notices to the union ministry of law and ministry of external affairs, returnable by December 10. The PIL said the rule violated the right conferred on LBGT community by the Supreme Court in the National Legal Service Authority Vs Union of India case. Referring the apex court judgment, the petitioner said the judgment dealt with various aspects relating to rights of transgender persons and upheld the rights of transgender persons to their self-identified gender and authoritatively held that any insistence for Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS) for declaring one’s gender is immoral and illegal. “The Supreme Court has clearly held that a person’s right to choose and express a gender identity fell within the ambit of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The right to legal recognition of the chosen gender identity forms the basis of a person’s personal autonomy, freedom and dignity and an important facet of rights under Article 21,” he added.

Regions: ,

Share this:

Other News from ,

Added on: 10/03/2024
Kyrgyzstan’s government has proposed problematic amendments to the criminal code and other legislative acts that would restore criminal charges for the mere possession of …
Added on: 10/02/2024
Tokyo BTM is an increasingly popular channel that focuses on queer culture in Japan. Created by two expat, Andrew Pugsley, from Canada, and Meng …
Added on: 10/01/2024
With Lebanon experiencing its deadliest day in nearly 20 years this month — not to mention the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine that …